I draw the line at when a third party internet-connected service is doing validation of ID. Let’s be honest though, I strongly believe such a thing isn’t possible on a FOSS operating system environment unless they could control what was bootable on the device at a firmware level, enforce signatures to ensure that you couldn’t boot something unrestricted, remove the ability to be root, and block LD_PRELOAD so signals couldn’t be faked. There’s probably more ways to circumvent that.

What I’m trying to say is real ID verification on Linux would be awfully hard to implement, and I guarantee you, nobody would put up with it. They’d fork to a version that doesn’t have it immediately as a protest. Right now, we’re considering implementing something akin to the date pickers that were ubiquitous when signing up for internet services in the early 2000s where it’s just an honor system.

    • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Stop letting the fascists frame the narrative.

      We don’t need local values at all. Computer should not be broadcasting personal identifiable info to every single website and cookie out there, regardless if it lets you lie or not. That’s fucking idiotic.

      If you want to do what these things claim to be for, and protect children, you make websites contain a flag for content rating and local devices do the filtering.

      Not the other way around, which is only useful for tracking. Most websites aren’t going to bother to follow through on it, anyway, why make it even more difficult and unlikely they do so?

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Computer should not be broadcasting personal identifiable info to every single website and cookie out there, regardless if it lets you lie or not.

        Good thing that’s not what you was proposed.

        You’re clearly too enraged to actually read the law though, so reality doesn’t matter to you.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      The whole point is to ‘protect’ people for things they shouldn’t do but are legal for others. Porn is the common example where many (but not all) object and want to keep thair kids away. which is why an id is needed - otherwise any kid will give a false age.

      • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 days ago

        The only way to do this that protects privacy is to accept that, but also parents of young children can just not give them root.