Relevant Post.

We(Lemmy users) are adblock users and are tired of capitalism that ruined Reddit.

All of us didn’t come here to look at ads again or to entertain capitalist dreams of embedding ads everywhere.

My recommendation is clear, let’s ban watermarked comics and work towards ad free community.

At the end, music don’t have watermarks and neither do art. So why should comics have watermarks?

Linking to the source should be the primary way of attribution.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 days ago

    Counter proposal: ban OP from this community along with anyone else who removes artist trademarks from comics they post.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I’m going to block beep, but they should 100% be banned for being a worthless piece of shit.

    • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Counter counter proposal: ban anyone who use this community to post ads.

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        hey have you considered changing your handle to ▇▇@▇▇▇▇.org, to stop watermarking your comments? cuz right now, seeing your name, i feel advertised to tbh

        • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          You can change the settings of your client to not show usernames and instead show only the name of the community the post is posted in.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Sure. But posting the artist’s name/watermark isn’t an ad, it’s their artwork.

        Ban posters who modify artist’s work maliciously to remove attribution.

  • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    OP, do you have some kind of humiliation fetish or why is your take this shit?

    Do you think that a painter’s signature on a painting is an ad? If I listen to music and the artist states their name, is that an ad? All of these are just a way of saying “I made this”. They aren’t ads in any meaningful sense of the word.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    While we could enforce the rule of link being the attribution, as a general rule it’s not what will happen when someone shares anything on the Internet. It will be ripped out of context and posted on random places with zero attribution.

    Exhibit A: yourself. Your post history does only occasionally contain links.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Aren’t most of them just a handle or name in the margin? Seems ridiculous to think it ruins your experience somehow. You’re just being actively hostile to artists for some reason.

      • They do…?

        Signatures and watermarks are in almost all works of art.

        A watermark on a piece of recorded music is something that is part of the digital composition. It can be in the metadata, it could be in the waveform itself. You’d only see it through analysis of the file.

        Same can, and often is, done with video. Even code for software.

        A good watermark is one that isn’t obvious, so it can’t be removed or tampered with.

        • Beep@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          You made a good point… For my argument!

          Music don’t contain watermarks that ruin the experience in the work itself.

          It’s available in text attribution/ metadata base.

          Leave the experience alone out of the attribution.

  • FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I am with you and also think we should visit every existing museum and remove the signature from the Artists!!

    The sign inside the museum should be enough! Why did we paid for the museum in the first place if we see “Artist ads” like signatures?

  • Speiser0@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Did the copyright holder (i.e. the artist) give you permission to redistribute their work without attribution? If not, it’s a copyright validation and illegal in most countries.

    I’m not really against pirating (you would copy a car), if you are taking from the rich. But that’s not the case here.

    And holding back information about the source of the comic is just evil to the readers here.

  • moakley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Is the front cover of a book an ad? Are the credits at the end of a movie an ad?

    If a signature is an ad, what is it advertising for exactly? Can you define the word “ad” for us? Imagine hating ads so much and literally not knowing what they are.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Artist attribution ≠ Ads

    For fucks sake, why you acting like every comic comes with a red “30% off” banner?

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    yeah I remember when they gave me a contract i put my watermark on with an ad of my brand (sometimes called full name).

    idiot.

  • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    You are against capitalism, and your approach is to remove author attribution, thus fucking small creators. That’s called punching down, and for being so against capitalism, you operate like a good dog.