Because I go to the fucking cited page, I don’t rely on the LLM to give me the answer. It’s not different to using Wikipedia.

Writing letters is the worst use for it, it’s not good for creative works.

And once again, we’re back to the issue of natural language search not being a feature of ctrl-f.

They introduce errors, hence why I get it to give me to the page on the source material to verify it myself.

Than you’re doing it wrong, I use it for similar things and find it far better than previous methods and I’ve been doing this shit for 20 years now.

There’s a reason why so many people are using it, it’s an extremely useful tool in some applications. It’s not perfect, but it saves a lot of time.

There’s really not value in doing something harder, and if it was a one page thing that wouldn’t be an issue.

Using their example you could get an LLM to return you the correct page in some documentation, searching through an entire site based only on a concept of what feature set you’re looking for. Ctrl-F cannot do that.

Didn’t know ctrl-f could parse natural language and not only rely on knowing the correct keyword. When did it gain that functionality?