• pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    You’ll be the 4753rd guy with the oops my llm trashed my setup and disobeyed my explicit rules for keeping it in check

    Read what I wrote.

    Its not a matter of “rules” it “obeys”

    Its a matter of literally not it even having access to do such things.

    This is what Im talking about. People are complaining about issues that were solved a long time ago.

    People are running into issues that were solved long ago because they are too lazy to use the solutions to those issues.

    We now live in a world with plenty of PPE in construction and people are out here raw dogging tools without any modern protection and being ShockedPikachuFace when it fails.

    The approach of “Im gonna tell the LLM not to do stuff in a markdown file” is tech from like 2 years ago.

    People still do that. Stupid people who deserve to have it blow up in their face.

    Use proper tools. Use MCP. Use a sandbox environment. Use whitelist opt in tooling.

    Agents shouldn’t even have the ability to do damaging actions in the first place.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Ah yes, lovely mcp. Lovely anthropic mcp. Make sure you give anthropic lots of money and use their tools and then you’ll be completely safe plugging the output of the llm into the os. Definitely fine yes.

      I bet you your contract with them says they’re not liable for shit their llm does to your files, your environment or your repositories, mcp or no mcp.

      Fool.